Skip to main content

Hello. It looks like you’re using an ad blocker that may prevent our website from working properly. To receive the best experience possible, please make sure any ad blockers are switched off, or add https://experience.tinypass.com to your trusted sites, and refresh the page.

If you have any questions or need help you can email us.

George Eustice ridiculed after claiming Scotch eggs is a ‘substantial meal’

Environment minister George Eustice on LBC radio - Credit: Twitter, LBC radio

Environment secretary George Eustice has been ridiculed after claiming that a Scotch egg “probably would” class as a substantial meal in a pub to allow people to have a drink.

The minister was ridiculed for entering the debate over what is classed as a “substantial” meal to go with alcohol in pubs in tier two areas after a lack of clarity from the government.

LBC presenter Nick Ferrari asked what constitutes as a meal – and whether a Scotch egg would be substantial enough.

“I think a Scotch egg probably would count as a substantial meal if there were table service,” he said, before adding “and often that might count as a starter”.

“This is a term that’s understood in licensing – you can have the concept of a table license for alcohol that also requires you to serve a substantial meal.”

“So we can serve Scotch eggs”, noted Ferrari, to some bemusement from listeners.

Pip Tomson responded: “Great. I’ll have a packet of crisps delivered on a plate then..”

“What about a pickled egg?”, queries Phil Ritchie.

Twitter user @4Spinspel wrote: “I can’t believe we’re seriously discussing this. The absolute lunacy of it.”

Another replied: “Fifteen pints of Stella and scotch egg please? Completely bizarre.”

Mark O’Toole wrote: “They haven’t got a clue, never heard a scotch egg called a meal before!”

Karen Shaf, meanwhile, tweeted: “Ironic, isn’t it? One minute, the government are denying kids a substantial school meal and the next insisting that a paying adult has to have one if they want a beer or glass of wine in a pub.”

“Maybe the government is trying to redefine the meaning of ‘food poverty’,” commented Anita Bellows.

“They’re actually taking the piss now, aren’t they?” asked Peter McClean.



Hello. It looks like you’re using an ad blocker that may prevent our website from working properly. To receive the best experience possible, please make sure any ad blockers are switched off, or add https://experience.tinypass.com to your trusted sites, and refresh the page.

If you have any questions or need help you can email us.